Anyone who owns a telescope or has looked at advertisements
for one has seen a cryptic number like "f/8" or "f/5" used in the description
of the instrument. This number represents the telescope's focal ratio,
an important specification that can tell you many things about the instrument.
Anyone who owns a telescope or has looked at advertisements
for one has seen a cryptic number like "f/8" or "f/5" used in the description
of the instrument. This number represents the telescope's focal ratio,
an important specification that can tell you many things about the instrument.
A telescope with a low ("fast") focal ratio offers
lower powers and a wider field of view at prime-focus for for a given
eyepiece. When using the telescope for prime-focus astrophotography, smaller
focal ratios mean shorter exposure times. Just the opposite is true for
larger focal ratios ("slow" telescopes): higher magnifications result
for a given eyepiece, but the field of view is more limited. And exposure
times for pictures tend to be longer.
A common myth is that fast telescopes offer brighter
images than slow ones. Image brightness is only influenced by the telescope's
aperture, which controls the telescope's light gathering ability. Say
you have a 6-inch f/10 telescope and a 6-inch f/5 telescope, each operating
at about 100x. If you point them both at a distant galaxy, the image in
each will be equally bright. That's because they are both 6-inch telescopes,
gathering the same amount of light, and magnifying by the same amount.
The difference is that a 15mm eyepiece is used in the f/10 to obtain 100x,
while a 7.5mm eyepiece would be needed for the f/5. (For comparison, the
15mm eyepiece would provide 50x in the 6-inch f/5). This is a somewhat
significant difference, because many observers find that eyepieces smaller
than 7.5mm can be less comfortable to view through (you generally need
to hold your eye closer to the lens as the eyepiece size decreases). This
makes it less comfortable to view through a "fast" telescope at high power,
especially if you wear eyeglasses. This effect can be relieved somewhat
by using a Barlow lens with an eyepiece. A 2x Barlow lens will make the
15mm eyepiece act at 100x in the f/5 while maintaining the same comfortable
eye relief. In addition, there are several lines of eyepieces currently
available which combine high power with very comfortable eye relief, but
they are very expensive.
Actually, the question isn't really which focal
ratios are better, but rather what kind of observing do you want to do.
Small focal ratio telescopes are definitely better for deep-sky observing
because of the lower power and wider fields that only they can provide.
(Yes, contrary to what you may think, lower power is better for faint,
deep-sky objects! This is why better telescopes from reputable companies
usually come with only low power eyepieces.) They are also better if you
plan to try any astrophotography because of the shorter exposure times
needed to obtain good pictures. Larger focal ratio telescopes are often
considered better for planets and double stars, because it is easier to
obtain the high powers necessary to view these objects with the "slow"
scope. But as I mentioned above, with the use of a good Barlow lens, you
can actually obtain the same high power with a fast scope. In general,
an f/8 telescope can be considered average and effective for general observing.
See also:
Telescope
Choices
Choosing The Right Telescope
Telescope Characteristics
Telescope Questions &
Answers
|